Talking Tactics: Arsenal v West Ham

Arsenal played West Ham over the weekend in what was a clash of styles with Arsene Wenger’s free flowing attacking philosophy going up against Big Sam’s long ball tactics, tactics that have previously been successful against Arsenal. Arsenal however fought hard (even after going down a goal against the run of play) and came back worthy winners with the game finishing with a scoreline of 3-1 to the Arsenal.
I am Giroud
Going into what would be a physical battle, many were calling for Olivier Giroud to start and lead the line for Arsenal and boy did he deliver on the supporter’s faith by scoring a goal and assisting on another.
The game in essence best captured what Giroud brings to the team. He’s a direct player who can hold up play, link with the midfield, and isn’t afraid to take shots. In all he finished the game with 8 shots (4 on target) along with 3 aerial duels won and 1 key pass made (1 assist). While it was great to see Giroud get his first PL goal, his movement throughout the game was brilliant, constantly pulling Reid and Collins with him freeing up space that was exploited by both Cazorla and Podolski. His link up play was also excellent choosing to play into space allowing players like Ramsey and Cazorla to latch on and take advantage.
Giroud’s direct approach gives Arsenal a different dynamic and with like minded players around him (Podolksi, Ramsey & Walcott), this approach can also be beneficial in breaking down teams that will resort to parking the proverbial ‘bus’.
Jekyll and Hyde on the Right Wing
With Giroud leading the line, Gervinho was started on the right wing. Sadly the Ivorian finished the match with 0 shots, 0 key passes and 0 successful dribbles; in other words, he had a game to forget.
McCartney and Jarvis doubly drew the duty of containing Gervinho but they did not play the game completely tight along the left flank which could give Gervinho ample space to work with. What West Ham did do was crowd the midfield in the first half forcing Gervinho to take himself out on the flank repeatedly where his threat was easily nullified.
With such a poor performance Gervinho was taken off and Theo Walcott came on around the 60th minute. The introduction of Walcott completely changed the dynamic on the right wing. Theo’s speed gave both McCartney and Reid numerous problems. Theo succeeded where Gervinho failed for one simple reason, directness. While Gervinho was constantly looking to cut in from the right, Theo looked to take on the leftback. As the second half wore on, West Ham pushed further up, freeing up space for Theo to take advantage of. And once Theo has space, its just a case of whether or not his shot is on target. With the space he was given he was able to pull away from the West Ham defenders and score from a delicious Giroud through ball and provide the assist for Cazorla’s screamer.
To some this may be further indication that Theo is a ‘super sub’ who can use his speed versus tiring legs later on in games however what this game displayed was that Theo’s directness was better utilized in an away game setting when the home team chose to go for the win. Gervinho has the most success on the flanks in home games where opposing team are more compact and where Arsenal wins the midfield battles opening up channels for him to attack. It should come as no surprise that Gervinho has also had his best games at home. Theo on the other hand approaches the game in a more simplistic fashion where he is happy to sit on the shoulder of the last man and attack in a straight line which suits the rigours of an away game where the home team opens up space as they push for a win allowing for ideal counter attacking opportunities. Theo’s approach does put pressure on the right back covering (any surprise why he has looked so good with Sagna in the team?) but the defensive stability of Jenkinson now means that Theo can enjoy the same free reign.
Mikel’s new Friend
Aaron Ramsey’s sparkling form along with Diaby’s injury ensured he got an opportunity to pivot in midfield alongside Arteta. While Ramsey has had his fair share of critics, this game went on to show why he may be Arteta’s ideal partner till Diaby/Wilshere are fit. The midfield was in a word, efficient with Mikel and Aaron completing close to 200 passes for the game. While both worked pivots, Arteta’s passing was based on creating space through short passes using both Cazorla and Ramsey while Ramsey was more direct than usual and provided thrust by constantly employing long balls (11/12 accurate long balls). Aaron’s approach in midfield mostly benefited Giroud who was able to take advantage of his passing range while also linking up in open space with Aaron’s movement ensuring he got into the right spots.
Defensively Aaron’s approach in midfield is similar to Arteta’s. Not the cleanest of tacklers, Ramsey got into positions to intercept and block off inner channels/space. While Arteta used his experience to compensate for his lack of speed throughout the game, Aaron’s movement ensured he could provide adequate cover to our CBs and make a couple of key interceptions and finished the game with 2 tackles and 2 interceptions (game high).
The worry with Aaron however is that he always has a mistake in him and that mistake directly lead to a West Ham goal. While many have wondered if having a more orthodox tackler in midfield would benefit our system and Arteta more, if Aaron is able to curb his defensive lapses he would indeed make ideal pairing with Mikel as their approach, passing range and defensive style compliment each other as evident against West Ham.
Conclusion
The scoreline in the end was flattering as West Ham had their share of chances but what was remarkable was watching Arsenal stay resilient and fight its way to a win. In seasons past, Arsenal would have come back with dropped points from these types of games with an inability to match and compete against bigger and physical teams. But this is a different Arsenal team, one that is gritty and willing to dig deep and in the end were able to will their way to a hard fought and thoroughly satisfying away win.
INFOGRAPHIC (by DAG)
7 comments
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Stag thanks. There are still some glitches (like the reply function on comments not working) but we’re getting there.
Wow!
Looks FANTASTIC DAG…
well done!
Testing one two three. Just trying to check and see if the comments are working in this new blog.
We are in the process of completing the server migration. There are still little glitches on the site. Trying to work those out.
I dunno, I guess I saw the match differently. Personally, I think this group is better equipped to play on the break and I agree we benefited from Fat Sam’s decision to press for a winner. When Vaz Te left his foot in on Vito’s (homely) mug and hurt himself, the tide turned. It was coincident with Theo’s introduction but not because of it. We also shouldn’t kid ourselves about their missed chances. Life would’ve been a LOT tougher had we been down 2 or 3 goals and they may have retreated into a defensive shell, which I fear this group may have (big) trouble breaking down.
Ramsey is doing better but he has a distressing tendency to pass directly to his teammate’s feet AND presenting himself as a similar (static) target, believing he can turn (almost always to his right) and break things open. Compared to the leading balls and suggestions for SPACES into which players should pass the ball we got used to with Cesc (and for which Jack Wilshere looked an able apprentice) it’s a big come down. Like you say, Arteta is slow but he is also brilliant at protecting the ball with his body. He’ll have to be if Ramsey sticks to his M.O. and I fear for the team being able to create good spells of possession without bad giveaways (leading to goals) against the better teams. We’ll also have to see if Gibbs can come back at LB. Things may be different with Santos in there as he seems almost allergic to the touch line and makes things super narrow playing as a 4th CM….
If, however, we can create space in there with a regular central MF of Wilshere/Diaby, Santi and Arteta, I think we’ve got a potential gem in Giroud, who can lay the ball off nicely with his left foot and is a willing runner for return passes AND to create space for others by running AWAY from the ball (see first goal at Liverpool). If Poldoski, Gervinho, Santi, Ox and Theo can clue into his ideas and his work rate, goals should follow. Amognst the rest, I’m impressed that Gerv looked for a pass vs Olympiakos and Theo didn’t at West Ham….Gosh, it would be nice to have a little announcement about a contract extension for the latter over this Intl break….
Plenty of ifs, fo’ sho’, and I feel we shouldn’t pretend we weren’t fortunate. Still, far better than sitting around for two weeks after dropping points at Upton Park….
the graph looks pretty cool, even though i can’t read it.
the scoreline did flatter. west ham jammed up three really nice chances, two for nolan and one for carroll, to score. i agree that arsenal deserved to win the game but we’ve seen plenty of games where arsenal deserved to win and didn’t. just glad saturday wasn’t one of those days.
happy with giroud’s performance. still think he’s on bendtner’s level but he’s got a better attitude than the dane so i’ll take it. as for the praise heaped on aaron ramsey, we’ll need more than one game to declare him anything. i’ve never had a problem with his technical level but tactically, the jury’s still out.
you pose an interesting theory with theo away and gervinho at home. i’ll watch for that one. another angle could be that theo’s got a point to prove. i enjoyed his goal celebration with the fans. you can tell it meant a lot to him.
walcott has to proceed with caution. i understand he wants to be a striker but it’s tough. he compares himself to henry but there are a couple of differences between the two. first, henry had plenty of experience as a striker before coming to arsenal. i’ve been an henry fan since the ’96-’97 season and especially after the toulan u-21 tournament in the summer of ’97, have always viewed him as a striker; an anelka replacement when he came to arsenal.
second, henry is about 6’2″. theo is about 5’7″. midgets playing at center forward in the bpl is typically a bad idea. theo is trying to follow giroud @ 6’4″, van persie @ 6’1″, chamakh @ 6’2″, bendtner @ 6’3″, adebayor @ 6’4″, henry @ 6’2″, and anelka @ 6’2″. if arsenal still played a 4-4-2, maybe. there’s a reason the more clinical eduardo didn’t make it at arsenal. jermaine defoe is different in that he’s always been a striker and a damn good one.
i understand what theo wants but he really needs to be careful. the only place theo can get the money he wants is at chelsea or city and he won’t play center forward for them either. if he wants to stay in a top team playing for england and in europe regularly, arsenal are his best bet. we’ll see how it all works out.
Click on the image an it will increase in size so you can read it.